Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
Featured picture candidates ![]() Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2025 at 01:02:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
Info created and uploaded by AlexandreMachado – nominated by MrNinja -- MrNinja (talk) 01:02, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2025 at 23:19:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Food and drink#Meals (food_and_drink)
Info Thought I'd have a go at a food FPC (well, I have another I'm trying to muster up the courage to nominate). I bring you: chilaquiles, a traditional Mexican breakfast dish that consists of tortilla triangles doused in salsa (red, in this instance) and served with shredded meat. In this instance, it came with a fried egg and some feta cheese. All by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:19, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:19, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 23:54, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2025 at 21:51:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Brazil
Info created by Felipe Valduga – uploaded by High source – nominated by Heylenny -- heylenny (talk/edits) 21:51, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- heylenny (talk/edits) 21:51, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:20, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Brazilian architects
Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2025 at 21:42:23 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Others
Info created by Marinha do Brasil (Oficial) – uploaded and nominated by Heylenny -- heylenny (talk/edits) 21:42, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- heylenny (talk/edits) 21:42, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2025 at 19:30:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Strigidae_(True_Owls)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:30, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:30, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent! This would also be our first FP of this species. Cmao20 (talk) 20:31, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:20, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2025 at 17:35:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Chaetodontidae (Butterflyfishes)
Info Three species of butterfly fish and another fish. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:35, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:35, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:35, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 20:34, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:21, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 23:46, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2025 at 06:54:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Veneto
Info created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 06:54, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Lake Coldai & Civetta, epic view from the Dolomites. We're very small. —kallerna (talk) 06:54, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support I think, from the 7 perspectives this one is the best. -- -donald- (talk) 07:53, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support This image rather shows the mountain than the lake, so its title is not optimal. But very fine image indeed. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:02, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:45, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:01, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 14:07, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Huge wow Cmao20 (talk) 18:35, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2025 at 21:56:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Calidris
Info Least sandpiper (Calidris minutilla), smallest shorebird in the world. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 21:56, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 21:56, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:14, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:01, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Another least sandpiper was recently promoted to FP. This one is much better in terms of detail, colour, and pose. --Tagooty (talk) 12:53, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. I was so excited last week, when I came home from the muddy marsh with the best shots of a least sandpiper and semipalmated plover I've ever managed to take, and then saw Stephan nominated wonderful photos of exactly those two species! :) Figured I might as well nominate anyway, since they're a bit different. — Rhododendrites talk | 17:56, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:34, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 23:47, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2025 at 14:44:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Religion#Christianity
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:44, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:44, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:14, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support What a wonderful religious image. Wolverine X-eye 14:58, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support It could be a tiny bit sharper but still, great subject, good composition. Cmao20 (talk) 18:33, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 23:54, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2025 at 13:38:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments_and_memorials
Info created by Kingshuk Mondal – uploaded by Kingshuk Mondal – nominated by Herpking -- Kingshuk Mondal (talk) 13:38, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kingshuk Mondal (talk) 13:41, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment Interesting photo for sure. It may need a slight perspective correction though. Cmao20 (talk) 20:41, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2025 at 12:42:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Primates#Family_:_Cebidae_(Capuchins_and_Squirrel_Monkeys)
Info No FPs of this species. created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:42, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:42, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Thank you for the nomination! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:45, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- You're very welcome. Couldn't resist this guy's funny expression! Cmao20 (talk) 12:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support JayCubby (talk) 19:30, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:03, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:15, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:52, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:19, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:43, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Peulle (talk) 11:02, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:59, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support I like how the sun shines bright on the monkey. Wolverine X-eye 14:56, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:19, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 23:55, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2025 at 09:14:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Zosteropidae_(White-eyes)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:14, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:14, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:59, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:54, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 19:03, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:15, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:19, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:59, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose There are 2 FPs of this species. The busy foreground and large leaf at top right distract. --Tagooty (talk) 12:57, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry if I'm being annoying but how is the statement
There are 2 FPs of this species
relevant here? Wolverine X-eye 14:52, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry if I'm being annoying but how is the statement
- FPC is supposed to identify and promote the best images on Commons, and reviewers are at liberty to conclude that if a particular image is not the best photo on Commons of this species, how can it be one of the best photos in general? I think Giles's photo is superb, but Tagooty's vote is legitimate. Cmao20 (talk) 18:32, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Done: image cropped and edited in order to not have the upper leaf anymore. There's also less of the foreground now. I think the image now looks better -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:19, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- I agree - was already FP to me but even better now, a neater and cleaner composition. Cmao20 (talk) 20:39, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- FPC is supposed to identify and promote the best images on Commons, and reviewers are at liberty to conclude that if a particular image is not the best photo on Commons of this species, how can it be one of the best photos in general? I think Giles's photo is superb, but Tagooty's vote is legitimate. Cmao20 (talk) 18:32, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support I'm of the opinion that the photographer did well in capturing the bird and flowers in their natural environment. Definitely worthy of the FP star in my opinion. Wolverine X-eye 14:54, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 23:56, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2025 at 07:06:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Serbia
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:06, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:06, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:57, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:52, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:18, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:00, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nice building and good quality, but light is too dull in my eyes for FP. --Milseburg (talk) 14:14, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support The building is more or less centered and I can't say there's much wrong with the technical quality, so with that said, I don't see a reason for me to not vote in favor of this candidate. Wolverine X-eye 15:02, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2025 at 05:52:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class : Bivalvia
Info Maxima clam (Tridacna maxima), Zanzibar, Tanzania. This species is found in the oceans surrounding East Africa, India, China, Australia, Southeast Asia, the Red Sea, and the islands of the Pacific. As other bivalves have two valves on the mantle. These siphon water through the body to extract oxygen from the water using the gills and to feed on algae. They are much sought after in the aquarium trade, as their often striking coloration mimics that of the true giant clam; however, the maximas maintain a manageable size (only one third their size), with the shells of large specimens typically not exceeding 20 centimetres (7.9 in). Note: I'm proposing this image to FP after the discussion here. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 05:52, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 05:52, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support per my comments on the linked discussion Cmao20 (talk) 11:37, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:58, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2025 at 02:58:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#United States
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:58, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:58, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice view. Wolverine X-eye 04:20, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment Perspective should be corrected to the right. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 06:53, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Improved Dear reviewers @Wolverine X-eye and Kiril Simeonovski: In agreement with the photographer, a manual perspective correction was carried out in Photoshop following e-mail correspondence. The adjustment required the use of the manual distortion tool, which necessitated cropping 158 pixels from the right edge. The church is now properly aligned without any converging verticals. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:00, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support An attractive church, captured beautifully and from a pleasing angle. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:00, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:37, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:42, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2025 at 00:22:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Plants
Info created by Imogen Cunningham – uploaded and restored by JayCubby – nominated by JayCubby -- JayCubby (talk) 00:22, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- JayCubby (talk) 00:22, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Some minor dust on the centre-left petal, but overall excellent. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:48, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Done and dust cleaned up in other areas. JayCubby (talk) 01:25, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:28, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:04, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:24, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:18, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:40, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2025 at 21:05:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#India
Info created and uploaded by Ingo Mehling – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:05, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:05, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the nomination. --imehling (talk) 13:13, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:26, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:51, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:48, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support It feels as if I'm in the scene. --MB-one (talk) 14:48, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:08, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:16, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent detail in this vast panorama --Tagooty (talk) 12:59, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2025 at 18:50:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Varanidae (Monitor Lizards and Komodo dragon)
Info created by Mfalhajji – uploaded by Mfalhajji – nominated by روتانا -- Rotana🦋 (talk) 18:50, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Rotana🦋 (talk) 18:50, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support But please, add proper categories about the displayed species Poco a poco (talk) 19:55, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- Rotana🦋 as above, species category please. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:44, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 21:40, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:27, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:49, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:09, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Great capture -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:29, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:28, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Will support when proper species identification is made but this should not pass with the categories 'unidentified monitor lizard' and 'unidentified uromastyx' and I'm surprised so many people are willing to support it without any clarity as to the species. Cmao20 (talk) 11:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment Gallery fixed, at least we know the family and I went with the more visible one, as it can only be in one gallery. However if this is featured, you can place it in several FP categories. I also agree with the request for better identification. It's really down-heartening to see how many voters don't care about correct info and documentation of nominated images. FPC shouldn't be a place where you just go to "♥like" photos. --Cart (talk) 12:52, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:10, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support A big bite for the lizard! --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:07, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:39, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2025 at 12:36:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1940-1949
Info created by Dorothea Lange, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
Info Near Coolidge, Arizona, November 1940. Migratory cotton picker with his cotton sack slung over his shoulder rests at the scales before returning to work in the field.
Support This picture was on the cover of The Bitter Years exhibition book at the Museum of Modern Art, New York. It is clearly one of the masterpiece of the exhibition. Taken by Dorothea Lange, the same photographer who created the famous Migrant Mother picture. Contrary to all others of this exhibition, this picture is not available in the Library of Congress website, so the resolution is much less than others. Nevertheless, it is still very good. -- Yann (talk) 12:36, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment Yes; and so often you see it cropped unlike here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:49, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:43, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:27, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose -- This may be a Dorthea Lange, but IHMO a portrait with a hand covering the face does not make a great picture. MisawaSakura (talk) 22:54, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- @MisawaSakura: Her name is Dorothea Lange. Please be careful of the spelling. Actually the hand gesture is what makes this special. Yann (talk) 11:34, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- I simply don't agree. MisawaSakura (talk) 11:39, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- Art is subjective (even famous art) and of course you don't have to like it but a 'humble opinion' would not be an oppose vote. You might not like capuchin monkeys or white-eyes either, but I wouldn't expect an oppose vote on that basis.! Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:07, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
. FWIW Yann, there's a higher res image at here. Slightly cropped. JayCubby (talk) 00:26, 2 September 2025 (UTC)Support
- Ah nice. Yann (talk) 11:34, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:45, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ezarateesteban 12:09, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:47, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp, Radomianin, The Cosmonaut, MisawaSakura, JayCubby, Cmao20, Ezarate, and Agnes Monkelbaan: I uploaded a new restoration, based on the HR version linked by JayCubby. That print was very dirty. There are fingerprints allover. The negative was damaged, and there was some tentative to fix it with a pencil in a crude way. All fixed. What do you think? Yann (talk) 17:31, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- New version is better --Ezarateesteban 19:01, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support both, with a preference for the new version. JayCubby (talk) 17:48, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- And great job with the restoration! JayCubby (talk) 17:49, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- New version. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:00, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- I really like the new version, Yann - thank you for the careful restoration! -- Radomianin (talk) 19:42, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:11, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 12:52, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2025 at 11:22:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Tools
Info created by Didier Descouens – uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus – nominated by Theklan -- Theklan (talk) 11:22, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Theklan (talk) 11:22, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Thank you for this nomination. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:12, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:10, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:15, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:37, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2025 at 06:22:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Primates#Genus_:_Chlorocebus_(Green_monkeys)
Info Vervet monkey (Chlorocebus pygerythrus), Lake Nakuru National Park, Kenya. This Old World monkey of the family is native to Africa and has been noted for having human-like characteristics, such as hypertension, anxiety, and social and dependent alcohol use. Vervets live in social groups ranging from 10 to 70 individuals, with males moving to other groups at the time of sexual maturity. Studies done on vervet monkeys involve their communication and alarm calls, specifically in regard to kin and group recognition, and particular predator sightings. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 06:22, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 06:22, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:56, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 06:55, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent - great composition as well as great quality Cmao20 (talk) 11:43, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:45, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:10, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 13:03, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support very nice.--UnpetitproleX (Talk) 01:32, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2025 at 00:14:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Others
Info: happy September! I propose this photo as a good example of high-contrast photography technique, of which we currently have no FPs. Several types of contrast are present here: aside from the obvious brightly illuminated leaf counterbalanced by the dark leaf shadows, the deep red of the maple leaf pops against the neutral white and gray tones of the birch bark. Additionally, the smoothness of the birch bark contrasts with the veiny, detailed texture of the leaf. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:14, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:14, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice composition but I suppose the photography technique should be mentioned in the description and a category needs to be added. -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:49, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- thank you;
Done --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:00, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- thank you;
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:41, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support It's a shame I can only vote once. ;-) A wonderful photo. --XRay 💬 14:42, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 18:26, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:17, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:09, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:35, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Good motif, but the shadow across the bottom of the leaf spoils it for me. --Tagooty (talk) 13:02, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2025 at 00:15:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Tower_Bridge,_London
Info: while we have plenty of FPs of the bridge already, I believe this photo, with its special light and angle, adds something to the collection. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:15, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:15, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- I like it. I'm wondering if having the titular towers equidistant from the edge of the frame would be better composition, though. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:17, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, yes, I thought I had already centred it;
Done. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:32, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, yes, I thought I had already centred it;
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:53, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cool bridge. Wolverine X-eye 17:10, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support MisawaSakura (talk) 22:55, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:14, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Neutral For me it's too dark. I know, golden hour, but the shadows could be lighter. -- -donald- (talk) 11:15, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Better now. -- -donald- (talk) 14:28, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Sorry but my instinct is that this picture is underexposed and although it is good, I don't think it stands out amongst the other photos we have of this very common subject on Commons. Cmao20 (talk) 11:42, 2 September 2025 (UTC)Weak oppose
- New version is definitely better. Cmao20 (talk) 14:07, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Done @Crisco 1492, Wolverine X-eye, MisawaSakura, MZaplotnik, -donald-, and Cmao20: lifted shadows and brightened overall. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:02, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 14:42, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:10, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:33, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Prominent motif, I'm bothered by the shadow on the lower right tower. --Milseburg (talk) 14:18, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2025 at 18:47:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Equidae_(Equids)
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 18:47, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 18:47, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but the crop is unpleasant, at least in my eyes. Wolverine X-eye 16:51, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:38, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:09, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Too much grass in front and awkward crop. --Tagooty (talk) 13:04, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2025 at 18:40:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Fagales#Family_:_Betulaceae
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 18:40, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 18:40, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:16, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Pleasant and satisfying composition Cmao20 (talk) 12:56, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Agree, it's pleasant but it isn't enough IMHO for FP, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful typical August shot.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:09, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 14:20, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support I like the contrasting colours and the details --imehling (talk) 20:29, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2025 at 17:33:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Coreidae (Leaf-footed Bugs)
Info created & uploaded by Johannes Robalotoff – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 17:33, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 17:33, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Question Impressive. What is the size of this bug? Yann (talk) 18:31, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Though I agree that having an approximate size of the bug would be useful. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:16, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 07:14, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent Cmao20 (talk) 12:55, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 15:37, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Good capture of what seems to be an extremely, extremely small animal. Wolverine X-eye 16:53, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:39, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --D-Kuru (talk) 07:14, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment: the image description contains a link to en:Coreus marginatus, where the adult's size is stated: 13-15mm. A nymph as depicted could be a bit smaller, maybe around 7-10mm (cf. en:Hemimetabolism). Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 13:00, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Question @Johannes Robalotoff: do you happen to know on which leaf this nymph is sitting? If you could name the species, any onlooker could infer the animal size, as the trichome can provide an in-built scale. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 13:04, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment From the optical properties of my equipment I can say that the distance between the antenna tips on the image is about 10 mm. So you can estimate that the head and body width are much smaller. (I do not remember the kind of leaf the insect is sitting on.) --JRff (talk) 06:54, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Johannes Robalotoff: apropos of “optical properties of my equipment”: could you please add a short hint about the equipment you have used to create this photo to the description? This photo is so stunning that it looks almost too good to be real, and living in a time of fake images, people may think it was just generated with the help of AI. So it would be helpful to tell us a tiny little bit about the equipment. The Exif data say the photo was taken with a X-T3, but what lens or microscope was used? How many images were used in the focus stack? It would be great if you could add this. Thank you! – Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment Thank you for the "almost too good to be real". I can give a long hint: The lens is also documented in the Exif data. It is simply the Wiki which displays the focal length only. If you download the original file and look into the Exif data with an appropriate tool, you can see that the lens is Fujifilm's XF80mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro. This lens can produce images with reproduction ratio 1:1 on the sensor at closest focus distance. Thus the focus plane of the antenna tips has just about this reproduction ratio. If you know the pixels per distance for the sensor of the X-T3 (6240 per 23.6mm) you can calculate the distance of the antenna tips on the image, roughly. Of course, one image with the closest focus plane would show only sharp antenna tips, nothing else, at an aperture F5.6. Therefore the image is stacked from a series of images, as the note on the image page already says. The number of single images is 267. (I coded it into the file name in order to remember myself.) It is only possible to shoot so many aligned images, if there is practically no wind blowing, if I put the camera on a tripod with horizontal arm and precision macro rail, if I use a remote release as well as the automatic focus bracketing from the X-T3, which moves the focus plane automatically in precise steps. Even when shooting at maximum image rate, the series takes over 10 seconds, so all will work only with insects which sit without movement for a long time. (But especially heteroptera are often perfect models in this respect.) Finally, there is some work to do on the computer in order to put the whole stack together using software. This does not work completely automatically, since different algorithms produce different artifacts, so that results from different computations have to be partly merged manually. So these images are nice to watch on one hand, but they require a tremendous lot of work on the other hand. Is this enough explanation? I am afraid this story is too long to put it on the image page, and I cannot do this for all the many uploaded images taken with the same technique. --JRff (talk) 18:13, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
SupportRotana🦋 (talk) 18:00, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 19:45, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:30, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:09, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:27, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MB-one (talk) 14:41, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Strong support Great. – Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent pose and detail. --Tagooty (talk) 13:05, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--UnpetitproleX (Talk) 01:30, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2025 at 16:10:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
Info No FPs of this well known and distinctive building. In my opinion stunning light and a good composition. created by Domeian – uploaded by Domeian – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:10, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:10, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 17:33, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support – Great light and colours. —Bruce1eetalk 17:34, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support stunning view. --MB-one (talk) 20:28, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:16, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:53, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 07:14, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:15, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Acroterion (talk) 00:13, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:39, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Wow! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:33, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 06:55, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:10, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:27, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 14:43, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Aristeas (talk) 10:29, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--UnpetitproleX (Talk) 01:30, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2025 at 15:33:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Film
Info created by Unknown – uploaded by Fæ – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 15:33, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ezarateesteban 15:33, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment Seems to be some significant bleeding, especially on the viewer's right side of the poster. Do we have any other versions to compare? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:18, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
- I restored from original, seems to be the unique source in internet --Ezarateesteban 22:30, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
- Huh, they were using black paper to prevent bleeding. I suspect the contrast and levels editing during the restoration process brought out something that wasn't intended to be there. Worth doing a new layer, 50% opacity, of the white/cream colour (limited only to areas that are that colour, of course) to offset the bleedthrough? Similar to what I did to remove JPG artefacting at File:Jaws movie poster.jpg. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:28, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- I restored from original, seems to be the unique source in internet --Ezarateesteban 22:30, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
- I don't know, I'll investigate how to do it during week, if you or anyone desire to help, feel free to do, here is TIFF restored to work over it --Ezarateesteban 21:38, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- Sure. I'll have a go at it. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:42, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, so I've reduced the prominence of the red bleed-through on the TIF and the JPG. I saved the TIF with layers so you can see what I did (assuming Commons will store the layer data separately). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:05, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you!!! Ezarateesteban
- The TIF file hasn't any layers, a pitty that Commons doesn't store layers --Ezarateesteban 22:15, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oh. It's got the size for the extra layer. :/ — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:31, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- The TIF file hasn't any layers, a pitty that Commons doesn't store layers --Ezarateesteban 22:15, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Ezarate, Commons supports XCF (FOSS equivalent of PSD) files. JayCubby (talk) 19:36, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support - What's left looks worse at thumb than it really is. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:31, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Crisco 1492: You may want to replace the text “Support” by the usual
{{s}}
template; the bot understands and counts only the voting templates and will close this nomination soon if there is not a second regular{{s}}
vote. (Hint for nerds: Yes, we can cite the{{s}}
template in a comment – as long as we wrap it in<nowiki>...</nowiki>
, the bot ignores it and does not count it as a vote ;–).) – Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. Didn't even realize I'd done that. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:51, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! Such little glitches happen often, I just mentioned it because the bot would misunderstand this and close the nomination too early. – Aristeas (talk) 15:37, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
" Support JayCubby (talk) 16:08, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2025 at 10:45:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Libellulidae_(Chasers,_Skimmers,_Darters_and_others)
Info Blue dasher (Pachydiplax longipennis) with many attached parasitic water mites (Arrenurus). There's a better FP of this species already, but I thought it was worth a nom for the parasites -- never seen so many on a dragonfly, but apparently it's unclear how much harm they actually do. Seems like they couldn't help but weigh it down a bit, at least? all by — Rhododendrites talk | 10:45, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 10:45, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:34, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 12:55, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 13:50, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:56, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Great image. Wolverine X-eye 15:17, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --D-Kuru (talk) 07:15, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:26, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:57, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 21:42, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 06:56, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:10, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:26, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:28, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--UnpetitproleX (Talk) 01:30, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2025 at 08:09:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Rail tracks
Info created uploaded and nominated by D-Kuru -- D-Kuru (talk) 08:09, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment I saw this scene a day before I took the image. What fascinated me about the scene was the intense orange light, the reflected of it from the rails and trains and the diffraction by the hot air. The scene showed the residual heat of the day, hot air rising from the rails and bugs flying through the air combined with a train running unconditionally on time seen though a cold tunnel portal. That's why I left the image 'imperfect' in some areas like blown highlight on the reflections of the rails, no noise reduction, tunnel exit construction as 'frame', etc. You may also want to take a look at the other images listed below if you think they are better suited for FP. See here for a wider image for the site.
Support --D-Kuru (talk) 08:09, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment It's a nice view, but unfortunately the effect with the partial tunnel exit isn't coming out well. It looks more like a partial frame of an old glass plate photo that hasn't been cropped correctly. --Cart (talk) 10:51, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
- @W.carter: Before I uploaded the image I also tried to crop the image like this. The problem I had with this version was the part of the tunnel entrance on the left. If you cut that one out, centering on the train is pretty much impossible (unless you aim for a postcard size). Other ratios (eg. 3rds, golden selection etc) don't fit the scene IMO. Can you may share a crop would fit the picture better? --D-Kuru (talk) 12:03, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
- Ok since you asked. First of all, forget about all "rules" and "must be" ratios, those are just simple guidelines for near-amateurs and you are much more accomplished than that. ;-) Go with some gut instinct instead. My suggestion would be a slightly more radical crop, one that not just takes care of the tunnel exit but also deals with the glare up right. You get a much stronger view of the curving tracks that way. (At least it put the train at 1/3 from the top if that's any comfort to you.) I'll see if I can note this on the nomination page as well. --Cart (talk) 12:18, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
- Also, I'm not a fan of the kind of "multiple choice" nom you have presented here. At FPC you should only present the best shot of similar photos from a session. Your selection is part of the process. If voters think something is off with a photo, they usually go to the categories and look at other options. If you are uncertain about your choice, you might discuss that with other users before making the nom. With this many photos mentioned in your nom, you are also dividing voters and spreading them commenting on "their" own favorite instead of voting. It's counterproductive. --Cart (talk) 16:51, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
- I already decided what the best shot of the series is for me: The one I nominated.
- Even I'm not a regular voter on FPC, I often watch them. Over the years I saw multiple times that another image of the series or a requested edit was much more favoured over the nominated image. The other images were not included because I was unsure, but to give people a faster insight in the series. Nevertheless, as you are not wrong, I removed the set list from the nomination. If people like a different version much better, they can wirte so on the description page. --D-Kuru (talk) 15:42, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- Also, I'm not a fan of the kind of "multiple choice" nom you have presented here. At FPC you should only present the best shot of similar photos from a session. Your selection is part of the process. If voters think something is off with a photo, they usually go to the categories and look at other options. If you are uncertain about your choice, you might discuss that with other users before making the nom. With this many photos mentioned in your nom, you are also dividing voters and spreading them commenting on "their" own favorite instead of voting. It's counterproductive. --Cart (talk) 16:51, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
- Ok since you asked. First of all, forget about all "rules" and "must be" ratios, those are just simple guidelines for near-amateurs and you are much more accomplished than that. ;-) Go with some gut instinct instead. My suggestion would be a slightly more radical crop, one that not just takes care of the tunnel exit but also deals with the glare up right. You get a much stronger view of the curving tracks that way. (At least it put the train at 1/3 from the top if that's any comfort to you.) I'll see if I can note this on the nomination page as well. --Cart (talk) 12:18, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
- @W.carter: Before I uploaded the image I also tried to crop the image like this. The problem I had with this version was the part of the tunnel entrance on the left. If you cut that one out, centering on the train is pretty much impossible (unless you aim for a postcard size). Other ratios (eg. 3rds, golden selection etc) don't fit the scene IMO. Can you may share a crop would fit the picture better? --D-Kuru (talk) 12:03, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support I like everything about this. Cart's crop is fine but also I don't mind the blurry tunnel exit, it's a nice frame Cmao20 (talk) 13:55, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment – I like it, but I actually prefer the empty tracks version: the DoF is greater and the tracks in the foreground are a little sharper. —Bruce1eetalk 15:28, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 17:34, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support I've used the "environment as a frame" approach before, with File:The Canard River, River Canard, Ontario, 2025-06-03 01.jpg. I think it's a useful technique, and well executed here. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:19, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:26, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support I quite like the tunnel exit being included as-is. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 21:43, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:26, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Good, although I would prefer the empty tracks version because IMHO its composition is more balanced (yes, it’s almost identical, but sometimes tiny differences have a big effect). – Aristeas (talk) 10:26, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--UnpetitproleX (Talk) 01:29, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2025 at 07:41:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#Kazakhstan
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 07:41, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Красный wanna talk? 07:41, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support I like this a lot - the light, the colours, the smoke. Image quality is good. Cmao20 (talk) 13:54, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose I do like the image and it's technically good. But for me, that is not quite enough for it to be featured. Maybe it's the light, maybe the shrub on the right side. --MB-one (talk) 20:34, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:07, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Sorry, but I agree Poco a poco (talk) 19:50, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2025 at 07:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Fungi#Family_:_Boletaceae (Boletales, Boletes)
Info created by Vitaly Wilde – uploaded by Vitaly Wilde – nominated by -- Vitaly Wilde (talk) 07:40, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but I see too many issues with image quality as well as composition. The image quality suffers because of the small sensor of the phone (see eg. the top of the object the needles transition into the background). In other areas the image looks overprocessed (as many smartphone camera software will do). The composition is also not really that interesting as the main object in the middle is covered way too much for me. --D-Kuru (talk) 08:51, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The image may stand a chance at QI but regretfully I agree with D-Kuru here on quality. I don't mind the composition, but I'm not sure it compares well to some of Famberhorst's nice pictures of fungi where the subject is distinguished a lot more from the background - explore the gallery to find some of them Cmao20 (talk) 13:52, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2025 at 06:22:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Ploceidae_(Weavers)
Info created by Tisha Mukherjee – uploaded by Tisha Mukherjee – nominated by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:22, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:22, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:36, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent, maybe your best FP candidate so far Cmao20 (talk) 13:50, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 17:10, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:12, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:28, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support MisawaSakura (talk) 22:57, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 06:57, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:10, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:24, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. Good pose, excellent subject separation. – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--UnpetitproleX (Talk) 01:29, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2025 at 20:38:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Nymphalidae#Genus: Charaxes
Info created by MaheshBaruahwildlife – uploaded by MaheshBaruahwildlife – nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 20:38, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Atudu (talk) 20:38, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment With marked sexual dimporphism, the sex should be shown please Atudu. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:05, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Temporary oppose to allow response from Atudu. And nominations have been opposed frequently for poor categories. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:50, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment Charles, do I understand correctly that you just ask to mention the sex in the description? Then all of us should second this, it’s both important and simple. Atudu, could you please have a look? Thanks, – Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- Should be in file name ideally, but in description is OK. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:27, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Even the out parts of the object are out of focus, the wings and the main part have good detail. EXIF data seems to be wrong though "Date and time of data generation 00:01, 1 January 2024" --D-Kuru (talk) 08:16, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:12, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
SupportRotana🦋 (talk) 18:54, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:29, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 06:57, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:10, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:23, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I agree with Charles Cmao20 (talk) 12:11, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose for now. Wonderful and beautiful photo, great “3 D” effect – but Charles is right that the sex should be mentioned. – Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment Doing a quick look for ID help, while there is sexual dimorphism, there is also quite a bit of it looks like there's some variation between populations, with apparent overlap in appearance. I'd probably guess this is a male based just on what I see right now, but if others feel more confident, they should just update the file description themselves. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:53, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- The nominator knows his butterflies. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:27, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2025 at 20:22:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United Kingdom
Info created by Alexander-93 – uploaded by Alexander-93 – nominated by Alexander-93 -- Alexander-93 (talk) 20:22, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Alexander-93 (talk) 20:22, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Satisfying photo Cmao20 (talk) 13:49, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support I like both composition and colors. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:28, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:11, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support I like the off-center placement of the window and the emphasis on the masonry texture - which is called "vermiculation," a subset of rustication. Acroterion (talk) 00:19, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support per others. --MB-one (talk) 15:31, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:10, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:23, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support per Acroterion. – Aristeas (talk) 10:01, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
File:Gypse Caresse.jpg, featured
Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2025 at 17:33:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Geology and chemistry#Ca→
Info created and uploaded by Didier Descouens, nominated by Yann
Info Gypsum, Caresse-Cassaber, Pyrénées-Atlantiques, France. Size: 27 × 22 cm
Support -- Yann (talk) 17:33, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:54, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support The edges seem a bit cut out in some area, but considering black background it kinda has to be that way. --D-Kuru (talk) 08:46, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Agree that some of the editing around the edges is a bit rough, though Cmao20 (talk) 13:49, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:47, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:10, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 15:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:11, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:10, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:23, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:25, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:01, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2025 at 15:32:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport
Info all by MB-one -- MB-one (talk) 15:32, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- MB-one (talk) 15:32, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --BugWarp (talk) 16:22, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Support - Though I have to say, at 200 mm they must have been quite low! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:30, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice composition.--Alexander-93 (talk) 20:04, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:48, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 01:37, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:09, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:11, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Celestinesucess (talk) 12:02, 01 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Great capture! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:35, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 06:57, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:23, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:00, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2025 at 11:44:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Erebidae#Genus : Lymantria
Info created and uploaded by Ivan Gorgulenko – nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 11:44, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Красный wanna talk? 11:44, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment Good image quality but I'm not too fond of the pure black background Cmao20 (talk) 12:17, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:10, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:30, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 06:58, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support I don't like caterpillars in general, but this one looks beautiful. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:55, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:56, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Very effective light, nicely emphasizing the caterpillar. – Aristeas (talk) 09:57, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2025 at 06:43:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Orchidaceae
Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 06:43, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 06:43, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:18, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Depth of field is a bit shallow but plenty of the flowers are sharp. I don't think we should get to the point where we mandate focus stacking for pictures like this. It's still good. Cmao20 (talk) 13:47, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:33, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:10, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:30, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:58, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2025 at 18:25:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
Info Sunset at an elementary school in Hof, Bavaria, Germany, created by PantheraLeo1359531 – uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 – nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:25, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:25, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Yes - it may not be an exactly outstanding subject but I think this is a good way to depict an ordinary scene in a pleasing and satisfying way. The light is very nice and I enjoy the contrast between old and new. Cmao20 (talk) 12:13, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:20, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 21:09, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Night lighting and good detail but I struggle with the compo. It's not pleasent to me and furthermore I don't really see interesting elements in it. Sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 08:07, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:21, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Quality is very good and the resolution is high. But the motif lacks wow and the composition looks random. --Milseburg (talk) 22:39, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Exactly per Cmao20. I really like how the evening light adds something special to this scene. @PantheraLeo1359531: I would consider to strengthen the composition by cropping a little bit from the right margin (to remove the remnants of the cropped window and door) and a bit more from the bottom margin (to align the bottom margin with the diagonal at the left); see image note. – Aristeas (talk) 09:54, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2025 at 01:04:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#North Macedonia
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 01:04, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 01:04, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Nice study in decay, but the light is quite harsh Cmao20 (talk) 12:31, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:21, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 12:04, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2025 at 08:52:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Sturnidae_(Starlings)
Info created by Tisha Mukherjee – uploaded by Tisha Mukherjee – nominated by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:52, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:52, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- MisawaSakura (talk) 12:53, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Maybe a bit small, but at least it's sharp, and the composition is effective Cmao20 (talk) 14:42, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:08, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Interesting bird but level of detail is not the best Poco a poco (talk) 08:10, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Neutral per Poco a poco. --D-Kuru (talk) 08:29, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:30, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:48, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2025 at 04:34:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Lycaenidae#Genus : Cigaritis
Info created by Atanu Bose Photography – uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography – nominated by Sandipoutsider -- Sandipoutsider (talk) 04:34, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Sandipoutsider (talk) 04:34, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Depth of field is not as good as we are used to and the human made background is not adding up, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 06:19, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Weak support I don't mind the background but the depth of field is a bit shallow here Cmao20 (talk) 14:41, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:20, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2025 at 01:58:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info This is the last reenactor, I promise. A Confederate reenactor at the Cedar Creek Battlefield, Middletown, Virginia. This is about the hat, tassels and the fabrics - authentic fabrics and stitching are central to reenactor events -- created by Acroterion – uploaded by Acroterion – nominated by Acroterion -- Acroterion (talk) 01:58, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Acroterion (talk) 01:58, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose -- The hat and fabrics are nice, but the only see the back of the subject, which I think is not the best. -Theklan (talk) 07:52, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Yeah, this composition doesn't really work for me either, sorry. --Peulle (talk) 10:32, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Let's step outside the little style bubble that is FPC for a moment. This is a great compo in showing off the hat and the texture of his garments while placing them in a context with ambience. This sort or angles are often used when you don't want the model distracting from the pieces (here the hat). You certainly don't need a full frontal to get the vibe from the event. Excellent photo! --Cart (talk) 12:12, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Cart is right. This is a strong photograph, all about ambience and light. I agree that if we saw the front of the subject, the models might even distract from the overall 'vibe'. Cmao20 (talk) 14:39, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice sombrero :) heylenny (talk/edits) 17:33, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cart. JayCubby (talk) 23:46, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per above Poco a poco (talk) 14:53, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
Oppose good quality but no FP to me.--Ermell (talk) 06:33, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Separation could be even greater (esp. to the person on the left edge of the frame). But even so, this composition speaks to me. --MB-one (talk) 15:41, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nice hat, but overall too much shadows and the composition with people seen from behind doesn't work for me. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:19, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2025 at 00:20:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Canada
Info We have... a fair few Featured Pictures of the CN Tower. But I think this offers something different; it is from the angle that shows the most of the spire, starting just above the Rogers Centre, and thus gives the most comprehensive view of the tower. It backgrounds the tower with other buildings, including the still-under-construction CIBC Square II. Oh, and it's 250 megapixels, so you can see the guidewires, small windows in the shaft above the viewing platform, and other aspects of the construction that aren't evident at normal resolutions. All by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:20, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:20, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- I don't like extreme vertical photos, but 250 megapixels... wow! -Theklan (talk) 07:54, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:54, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:37, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Support That's a pretty long image. Wolverine X-eye 17:11, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:08, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment The resolution is impressive, indeed, and usually common for spherical panoramics by fullframe cameras. Anyway, the strings on the ride side seem to be not stitched correctly, I suppose --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:03, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- Linear, actually; this was at 240 mm, which meant most stitching errors were minimal (as far as I can tell, less change in angle). There were a couple frustrations; a Go Train came just as I was finishing up, and Rogers Centre's roof opened for the Blue Jays game; both meant parts of frames were unusable. And these wires, which seem to have moved in the moments between frames. I believe they should be fixed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:11, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment Impressive and detailed resolution. But the problem PantheralLeo mentioned should be solved, even when it's at the edge. --Milseburg (talk) 12:16, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:19, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2025 at 09:11:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Tyrannidae#Genus : Myiarchus
Info All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:11, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:11, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
Weak support It's good but it's not one of your best. I see from the EXIF that ISO 6400 was used and although I'm sure this was unavoidable, it does show here. Detail on the bird is mainly good although the beak is a little bit unsharp. The noise is clear to me though, and the noise in the background, although it looks normal when zoomed in to full, has given the bokeh a somewhat blotchy impression at smaller sizes. I still support because it is the best image of this bird on Commons. Cmao20 (talk) 12:39, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, high ISO. This little bird is known to perch deep in the vegetation, not out in the open where we want it! Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:09, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
- You are right, of course, I'm sure it was a hard target to capture. Maybe I'm too picky with these things. I actually prefer your other photo of this little one - though it would need some work in postprocessing. Anyway, it looks like this will be FP, and it does deserve the star. Cmao20 (talk) 12:35, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 18:33, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:45, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:27, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Peulle (talk) 10:36, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- MisawaSakura (talk) 12:55, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:19, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Sat 30 Aug → Thu 04 Sep Sun 31 Aug → Fri 05 Sep Mon 01 Sep → Sat 06 Sep Tue 02 Sep → Sun 07 Sep Wed 03 Sep → Mon 08 Sep Thu 04 Sep → Tue 09 Sep
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Tue 26 Aug → Thu 04 Sep Wed 27 Aug → Fri 05 Sep Thu 28 Aug → Sat 06 Sep Fri 29 Aug → Sun 07 Sep Sat 30 Aug → Mon 08 Sep Sun 31 Aug → Tue 09 Sep Mon 01 Sep → Wed 10 Sep Tue 02 Sep → Thu 11 Sep Wed 03 Sep → Fri 12 Sep Thu 04 Sep → Sat 13 Sep
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag featured or not featured – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the com-nom parameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:
== Set Promoted to FP ==
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}}, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY. - Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2025.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it by {{Assessments|featured=2}}.
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological list.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}}
- Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.