Jump to content

Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status

[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)

[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination

[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review

[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates

[edit]

How to review an image

[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure

[edit]
  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period

[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

[edit]
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
60,080 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 54,204 (90.2%) 
Undecided
  
 3,319 (5.5%) 
Declined
  
 2,557 (4.3%) 


New valued image nominations

[edit]
   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Kelly zhrm (talk) on 2025-08-20 09:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Statue of Leonardo da Vinci by Luigi Pampaloni, outside the Uffizi Gallery
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-22 04:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Lobelia speciosa flowers, in Garden of the Museum of the Americas in Auch
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose =>
declined. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-23 05:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapelle Notre-Dame (21) de la cathédrale Sainte-Marie d'Auch - Piscine (lavabo)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-08-23 09:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Ivanky, Uman Raion - Kindergarten (view from the southwest)

 Best in Scope --Ezarateesteban 20:51, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-08-23 09:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Ivanky, Uman Raion - House of Culture (view from the northwest)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2025-08-23 09:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Elk Hill, The Nilgiris - north face
Used in:
en:List of peaks in the Western Ghats • wikidata:Q135639226
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
Tisha Mukherjee (talk) on 2025-08-23 09:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Phoenicurus ochruros (Black Redstart female) in Kaziranga National Park

 Oppose For birds, the nominated image must be the best image of the species, irrespective of location. The scope should not include the location, and the nom must be compared with all similar images of the species. There are many 100s of such images of this species. There are already VIs of this species. If you think your image is better, there is a Most Valued Image review procedure to replace an existing VI with a better one. --Tagooty (talk) 10:15, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Tagooty: how to find if there is a VI for a specie? Can a specie have more than one VI?
  • @Tagooty: In the animal section "sub-scopes may be proposed to illustrate a specific aspect of behaviour". Can the sub-scopes be used for male or female of a specie?
Result: 0 support, 1 oppose =>
declined. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Milseburg (talk) on 2025-08-23 13:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Views of Schafkampspitze - view from the northwest
Used in:
de:Liste der Dreitausender in Nordtirol
Reason:
There are hardly any photos on Commons that even show this mountain. -- Milseburg (talk)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2025-08-23 13:22 (UTC)
Scope:
The Nilgiri Library, Ooty - front and east side
Used in:
en:Robert Chisholm (architect) • wikidata:Q135914407
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-08-23 16:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Warrior (ship, 1960), stern view
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Ezarateesteban on 2025-08-23 20:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Poster of The regeneration of worthless Dan
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2025-08-24 04:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Motor Tanker RIVAGE. ENI 2104768 Port and aft.
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-24 05:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapel of the Blessed Sacrament - Stained glass windows (14) by Arnaud de Moles - Cathédrale d'Auch
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-24 05:19 (UTC)
Scope:
"The Kiss of Judas" by Jean Douillé - Sainte Marie Cathedral of Auch
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-24 05:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Interior view of the right transept of the Sainte-Marie Cathedral of Auch
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-08-24 12:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Ivanky, Uman Raion - Village council (view from the northwest)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-08-24 12:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Ivanky, Uman Raion - Church (view from the north)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Kelly zhrm (talk) on 2025-08-24 14:01 (UTC)
Scope:
The Resurrection by Cecco del Caravaggio
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-25 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
The 3rd terrace of the monumental staircase Auch France
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-25 05:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Ficus microcarpa 'Ginseng' (Indian laurel)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-25 05:11 (UTC)
Scope:
The main pulpit in the nave of the Sainte-Marie d'Auch Cathedral
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-08-25 07:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Krachkivka - House of Culture (view from the south)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:55, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-08-25 07:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Krachkivka - Village council (view from the northwest)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:55, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Niklitov (talk) on 2025-08-25 12:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Category:Bely Lighthouse — Bely Lighthouse, Saint Nicholas Chapel (2013) and seaplane.
Used in:
Bely Lighthouse (ru), wikidata
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Tagooty (talk) 15:28, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-08-25 16:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Close-up of Shichifukujin in Sensō-ji, view in Asakusa Kannon Temple, Tokyo
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2025-08-26 04:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Cargo ship ANTJE, ENI 02006909, MMSI 244700852. Starboard side and front.
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-26 04:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait de Léonard de Trappes - Trésor de la cathédrale d’Auch
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-26 04:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Smithsonite on hemimorphite, Vieille Montagne, Belgium
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-26 04:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapelle Notre-Dame de Pitié - Vitraux d'Arnaud de Moles (13)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
WMrapids (talk) on 2025-08-26 06:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Saugatuck, Michigan (aerial view)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
WMrapids (talk) on 2025-08-26 06:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Bridgewater Place complex (view of exterior from east)
@WMrapids:  Neutral, Thanks for the clarification, but the lighting is very poor; I'll let the other nominators decide how they vote.--Pierre André (talk) 15:51, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
WMrapids (talk) on 2025-08-26 07:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Government Palace, Lima (Hall Principal - panoramic view)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-08-26 08:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Krachkivka - School (view from the south)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-08-26 08:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Krachkivka - Church (view from the southwest)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
WMrapids (talk) on 2025-08-26 08:39 (UTC)
Scope:
McKay Tower (view of exterior from southwest)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2025-08-26 16:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Interior of Chapelle Saint-Florent d'Oberhaslach
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2025-08-26 16:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint sépulcre de Niederhaslach
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2025-08-26 16:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Grotte de Lourdes de Niederhaslach
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2025-08-26 16:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Grotte de Lourdes d'Oberhaslach
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2025-08-26 16:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument aux morts à Niederhaslach
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-27 05:04 (UTC)
Scope:
The Deposition of the Cross by Jean-Baptiste Smets - Cathédrale Sainte-Marie d'Auch
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-27 05:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Elbaite - Polychrome - Cruzeiro mine, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-27 05:18 (UTC)
Scope:
The interior staircase of the House of Henry IV in Auch
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-08-27 09:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Tymoshivka (Uman Raion)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-08-27 09:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Krachkivka - First aid station and post office (view from the north)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
WMrapids (talk) on 2025-08-27 09:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Columbia Center (view from the north)

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 01:47, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-08-27 09:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Meoto-iwa, view from Futamichoe, (Japon)
Used in:
Global usage
✓ Done corrections made from the first version removing rectangular artifacts on the rock, and rope best regards.--Pierre André (talk) 16:56, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see any images with red rope. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:58, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-08-27 10:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Frogs of the Chōzuya at Shrines in Itoshima, Fukuoka, view from Futamigaura Torii (Japon)
Used in:
Global usage
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2025-08-27 17:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Palais de la Bourse (Bordeaux)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2025-08-27 20:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Immeuble 10 et 11 place Bir-Hakeim (Bordeaux)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2025-08-27 20:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Immeuble, 13 place Bir-Hakeim (Bordeaux)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2025-08-27 20:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Immeuble, 7 place Bir-Hakeim (Bordeaux)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2025-08-27 20:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Immeuble, 8 et 9 place Bir-Hakeim (Bordeaux)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-28 05:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapelle Notre-Dame des Agonisants (9) de la cathédrale Sainte-Marie d'Auch - Altarpiece of Saint Anthony the Abbot
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-28 05:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Allium vineale (wild garlic) immature inflorescence
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-28 05:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapelle du Saint Cœur de Marie - Vitraux d'Arnaud de Moles - Cathédrale d'Auch
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-08-28 09:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Chorna Kamianka - Village council (view from the northeast)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-08-28 09:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Chorna Kamianka - School (view from the northwest)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Tisha Mukherjee (talk) on 2025-08-28 17:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Ploceus philippinus (Baya Weaver) calling

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 01:54, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-08-28 21:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Alcohol advertising illustrated posters of Japan, view in Hanami-koji Street, Kyoto (Japon)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-08-28 22:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Illustrated poster of Garaku-ta Market in Takayama, view in Hanami-koji Street, Kyoto (Japon)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2025-08-29 04:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Motor Tanker RIVAGE. ENI 2104768 Detail behind ship with wheelhouse.

 Comment I think this is a better image as it shows the whole ship from the same angle (cropping would help). The scope needs to be formatted as per other ship VIs. --Tagooty (talk) 15:25, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
*Thanks for your suggestion. I chose this photo because it captures the living and steering areas well.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:45, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Answer: I don't know what you mean by powder tanker, but it's a motor tanker. That's clearly stated in the vessel description. As far as I'm concerned, the ENI number is a good scope. The number belongs to the vessel, while the name sometimes changes regularly.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:37, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • When the name changes, the external appearance (paint work, etc) may change, so the convention is to include both a permanent number and the name in the scope. There could be a VI for each name.
    For VI of Rivage, I would support the cropped image with the rear view of the full ship. It also shows the details of wheelhouse etc well. --Tagooty (talk) 03:20, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-29 05:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Orgues de tribune de l'Église Saint-Orens in Auch

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 15:16, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-29 05:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Monarda punctata - inflorescence
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-29 05:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Vincent de Paul en gloire avec deux religieuses par Louis Saint Paul - Cathédrale Sainte-Marie d'Auch
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-08-29 09:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Berezivka (Uman Raion) - House of Culture (view from the northeast)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-08-29 09:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Chorna Kamianka - Church of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary (view from the east)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-08-29 10:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Miyako Odori Poster announcing the spring dance of the Gion district, view in Gionmachi Minamigawa, Kyoto, (Japon)
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2025-08-29 15:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Pudumund Police Station (G2 and T4), Ooty
Used in:
wikidata:Q135998248
  • While the Pudumund Police Station serves ~20-30K local people, I believe it is more than "of only local interest". About 3m tourists visit Ooty annually, and many of them visit Pudumund which includes major tourist attractions. These tourists hail from all parts of India and some come from abroad. Some of these visitors may be involved in traffic or other police issues, so have an interest in the Pudumund Police Station. This police station has appeared in the regional and national publications over more than 15 years: 2009 case and 2023 case in the Madras High Court (the Court serves ~84m people); 2025 news in The Hindu, a reputed national newspaper, etc.
    A building of interest to potentially millions of people is likely to figure in some Wikimedia projects, and hence deserves a VI scope. --Tagooty (talk) 03:39, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 30 August 2025
Scope:
Lethe goalpara (Large Goldenfork), ventral
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Tisha Mukherjee (talk) on 2025-08-29 19:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Parus cinereus (Cinereous tit) eating
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-30 05:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Amazzone by Ettore Tito
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-30 05:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapelle du Saint-Sépulcre arquebusier - Cathédrale Sainte-Marie d'Auch
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-30 05:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait de François-Augustin Delamare by Anatole Dauvergne - Trésor de la cathédrale d’Auch
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-08-30 08:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Berezivka (Uman Raion) - Village council (view from the northeast)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-08-30 08:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Berezivka (Uman Raion) - Kindergarten (view from the northeast)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-08-30 10:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Okimono of a domestic teaching scene, in the Tokyo National Museum, (Japan)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
WMrapids (talk) on 2025-08-30 12:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Aerial photographs of Windsor, Ontario - view front the northwest
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ on 2025-08-30 14:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Eurocopter AS332 Super Puma

Scope changed from AS 332 Super Puma in the Indonesian Air Force to Eurocopter AS332 Super Puma {{{3}}}

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
@Charlesjsharp: I modified the scope following your advice. You may wish to reconsider your vote, or advise if it needs to change. Also ping @Pierre André Leclercq: for your information. Thanks, ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 04:38, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ on 2025-08-30 14:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Lockheed C-130B Hercules, view from the front

Scope changed from Lockheed C-130 Hercules of the Indonesian Air Force, view from the front to Lockheed C-130B Hercules, view from the front {{{3}}}

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
@Charlesjsharp: I changed the scope. Please advise whether it is proper or requires further correction. Thanks, ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 04:47, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ on 2025-08-30 14:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Lockheed C-130 Hercules of the Indonesian Air Force, view from the front right
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-08-30 21:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Mazda6e - left front view
Used in:
de:Mazda, de:Mazda6e
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-08-30 21:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Volkswagen T-Roc Cabriolet - left rear view
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-08-30 21:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Volkswagen Polo V GTI - right front view
Used in:
de:VW Polo V
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-31 04:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Mise au tombeau - Cathédrale Sainte-Marie d'Auch

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 00:41, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-31 05:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Cronstedtite, Wheal Jane, St Day Parish, Cornwall, England - Former Felix Pisani Collection with Felix Pisani autograph.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-08-31 05:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait de Jean-François de Montillet de Grenaud by Jean-Baptiste Smets - Trésor de la cathédrale d’Auch
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-08-31 07:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Volkswagen T-Roc Cabriolet - left front view
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-08-31 09:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Yurpil - Club (view from the southwest)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-08-31 09:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Yurpil - Yurpil hydroelectric power station (view from the south)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tisha Mukherjee (talk) on 2025-08-31 09:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Turnix suscitator (Barred Buttonquail) male
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tisha Mukherjee (talk) on 2025-08-31 10:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Turnix suscitator (Barred Buttonquail) female
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
heylenny (talk/edits) on 2025-08-31 02:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Câmara Municipal de Porto Alegre
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2025-09-01 04:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Sculptures Sur En, Sent. Sculpture Horber 1-2013. Artwork Peter Horber.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-09-01 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Tower of Armagnac, South exposition
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-09-01 05:06 (UTC)
Scope:
'Agapanthus 'ever white' Cultivar - inflorescences
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-09-01 05:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Vincent de Paul, Chapelle Saint-Jean-Baptiste - Cathédrale Sainte-Marie d'Auch
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-09-01 09:08 (UTC)
Scope:
High school in Dzendzelivka (view from the southwest)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-09-01 09:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Dzenzelivka - School (view from the northwest)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-09-01 09:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Banryutei, Kongobuji, view from the northwest
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-09-02 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
The start of 'rue Edouard Lartet' from 'rue de Valmy in Auch'
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-09-02 05:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Statue of Saint Anthony the Abbot (Anthony the Great) - Cathédrale Sainte-Marie d'Auch
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-09-02 08:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Dobra (Ukraine) - House of Culture (view from the northeast)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-09-02 08:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Dobra (Ukraine) - School (view from the northwest)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Kingshuk Mondal (talk) on 2025-09-02 08:56 (UTC)
Scope:
World Heritage Monument, Sundarbans National Park
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-09-02 10:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Kabuto from the Edo period in Tokyo National Museum view in main building 2nd floor (Japan)
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-09-02 15:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Ford E-Tourneo Courier - left front view
Used in:
de:Ford, de:Ford Romania
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-09-02 15:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Volvo V60 Polestar Engineered (SPA) - right rear view
Used in:
de:Volvo V60
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-09-02 15:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Smart Crossblade - right front view
Used in:
de:Smart Fortwo, de:Bertrandt
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-09-03 05:08 (UTC)
Scope:
The The 4th terrace of the monumental staircase Auch France
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-09-03 05:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Retable de Sainte-Thérèse-d'Avila - Cathédrale Sainte-Marie d'Auch
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-09-03 08:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Kyshchentsi - Village council (view from the northwest)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2025-09-03 08:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Kyshchentsi - First aid station (view from the southwest)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-09-03 10:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Aka-ito Odoshi Yoroi, Musashi Mitake Shrine, view at the Tokyo National Museum (Japan)
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2025-09-03 15:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Tuticorin Airport, New Terminal building, airside (south) facade
Used in:
en:Tuticorin Airport
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-09-03 16:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Samurai Dō-maru, view at the Tokyo National Museum, Japan
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Ranjithsiji (talk) on 2025-09-03 19:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Chandravalayam - is an accompanying musical instrument used by singers to recite Malayalam epic 'Ramakathappattu'.
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Kelly zhrm (talk) on 2025-09-04 00:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Aglais io (European Peacock) on Prunus spinosa (Blackthorn)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2025-09-04 03:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Tuticorin Airport, new control tower, airside (south) facade
Used in:
en:Tuticorin Airport
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates

[edit]

hamster

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2011-12-10 22:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Cricetus cricetus (European Hamster)

 Support Excellent. All criteria met.--Jetstreamer (talk) 01:46, 11 December 2011 (UTC)  Support Seems to be the best one Kersti (talk) 17:13, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky talk 20:32, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-01-04 16:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Cricetus cricetus (European hamster)
Reason:
replacing image of museum specimen -- Charlesjsharp (talk)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Acridotheres ginginianus nests

[edit]
   

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Moheen (keep talking) on 2025-04-27 22:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Acridotheres ginginianus nests
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Moheen (keep talking) on 2025-04-27 22:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Acridotheres ginginianus nests
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Au chat barré, ancien estaminet avenue du Peuple Belge (Lille)

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-04-24 21:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Old tavern Au chat barré avenue du Peuple Belge, Lille, view from Parc Louise de Bettignies
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2025-05-05 19:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Au chat barré, ancien estaminet avenue du Peuple Belge (Lille)
Reason:
Perspective is ok on this one. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:31, 5 May 2025 (UTC) -- Sebring12Hrs (talk)[reply]

 Support Light and colors are superior. --Milseburg (talk) 14:10, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Immeuble, 31 rue de Gand (Lille)

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-04-25 15:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Renaissance house, rue de Gand 31, Lille, view from rue des Tours
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2025-05-05 19:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Immeuble, 31 rue de Gand (Lille)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Hôtel du Juge Garde des Monnaies

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2025-04-27 16:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Hôtel du Juge Garde des Monnaies, 61-63, rue de la Monnaie (Vieux-Lille), view from 28 Rue de la Monnaie
Used in:
Global usage
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2025-05-05 19:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Hôtel du Juge Garde des Monnaies, Lille
Reason:
The left facade is visible from this view. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 06:34, 6 May 2025 (UTC) -- Sebring12Hrs (talk)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

bats

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-08-05 13:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Rhynchonycteris naso (Long-nosed proboscis bats)

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:54, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-05-06 15:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Rhynchonycteris naso (Long-nosed proboscis bats)
Reason:
I use a better camera these days! -- Charlesjsharp (talk)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Karl Marx

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
~ Moheen (talk) on 2015-12-20 06:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of Karl Marx
Used in:
see Global file usage
  •  Support I have checked this submision against the six VI criteria. AS this is a studio image, the geocoding requirement is not neccessary. In my opinion this submission meets the other five critieria. I would however recommend changing the scope from "Portraits of Karl Marx" (plural) to "Portrait of Karl Marx". (Singular) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinvl (talk • contribs) 14:28, December 20, 2015‎ (UTC)
✓ Done ~ Moheen (talk) 10:51, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, There are several very good portrait paintings of KM. It is usual here to add "photographic portrait of KM".--Jebulon (talk) 20:56, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:25, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
User:Giovanni Cardinali (talk) on 2025-07-08 08:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of Karl Marx
Used in:
see Global file usagecontent pages (optional) -->
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Peace Palace

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2016-12-15 16:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Peace Palace (front view), The Hague
Used in:
fr:Palais de la Paix, fy:Fredespaleis, nl:Vredespaleis, ru:Дворец Мира

Scope changed from Peace Palace (front view), The Hague to Peace Palace (front view), The Hague. Note the underlying category has been changed, not the visible text. --Martinvl (talk) 22:44, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:02, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wolf im Wald on 2025-08-03 21:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Peace Palace (front view), The Hague
Used in:
en:Andrew Carnegie, es:Arquitectura de los Países Bajos
Reason:
Nearly similar view but higher detail level. -- Wolf im Wald
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Doris Day

[edit]
   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2015-03-27 10:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Doris Day

 Info Studio shot, so no geocoding. Yann (talk) 10:37, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply] 

Scores: 
1. Doris Day, Aquarium, gottlieb.01841.jpg: -1
2. DorisDay-midnightlace.jpg: +5 <--
=>
File:Doris Day, Aquarium, gottlieb.01841.jpg: Declined 
File:Day-midnightlace.jpg: Promoted <--

--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:21, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
JayCubby (talk) on 2025-08-07 01:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Doris Day
Used in:
extensive
Reason:
Good resolution reproduction of a useful studio portrait. -- JayCubby (talk)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

[edit]
   
Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=1008566955"